<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Double-NAT Blues: Tackling Asterisk&#8217;s Thorniest Problems	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://nerdvittles.com/double-nat-blues-tackling-asterisks-thorniest-problems/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://nerdvittles.com/double-nat-blues-tackling-asterisks-thorniest-problems/</link>
	<description>Ward Mundy&#039;s Technobabblelog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2020 19:59:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Trousle Undrhil		</title>
		<link>https://nerdvittles.com/double-nat-blues-tackling-asterisks-thorniest-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-176781</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Trousle Undrhil]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2018 14:45:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nerdvittles.com/?p=26710#comment-176781</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If you are going to be using NeoRouter, why not just install the NeoRouter client on your travel laptop (with the softphone) and connect the softphone directly to your home/office PBX over NeoRouter?  Why throw another PBX into the mix?

&lt;i&gt;[WM: As we noted at the top of the article, if it works, great. We were offering a solution for those cases in which NAT routers at both ends of a call often can cause RTP packets to get lost resulting in audio failures.]&lt;/i&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are going to be using NeoRouter, why not just install the NeoRouter client on your travel laptop (with the softphone) and connect the softphone directly to your home/office PBX over NeoRouter?  Why throw another PBX into the mix?</p>
<p><i>[WM: As we noted at the top of the article, if it works, great. We were offering a solution for those cases in which NAT routers at both ends of a call often can cause RTP packets to get lost resulting in audio failures.]</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
