<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Last Frontier: Handling Incoming Faxes with Asterisk	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://nerdvittles.com/handling-incoming-faxes-with-asterisk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://nerdvittles.com/handling-incoming-faxes-with-asterisk/</link>
	<description>Ward Mundy&#039;s Technobabblelog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 14:17:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Christian		</title>
		<link>https://nerdvittles.com/handling-incoming-faxes-with-asterisk/comment-page-1/#comment-2697</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 07:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nerdvittles.com/?p=88#comment-2697</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Newbie here! Trixbox 2. Everything looks good, recieving faxes, but tif file includes only part of the real fax pages. Header and first part of tex is ok, then it just cuts it. Filesize vary. Cant find any parameters wich may innfluence this. Any ideas? Or is it just not &quot;quite soup yet&quot; ?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Newbie here! Trixbox 2. Everything looks good, recieving faxes, but tif file includes only part of the real fax pages. Header and first part of tex is ok, then it just cuts it. Filesize vary. Cant find any parameters wich may innfluence this. Any ideas? Or is it just not &#8220;quite soup yet&#8221; ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: joshua		</title>
		<link>https://nerdvittles.com/handling-incoming-faxes-with-asterisk/comment-page-1/#comment-2664</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[joshua]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 00:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nerdvittles.com/?p=88#comment-2664</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Can we can an updated version of this for Trixbox 2.2??]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can we can an updated version of this for Trixbox 2.2??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: John ffitch		</title>
		<link>https://nerdvittles.com/handling-incoming-faxes-with-asterisk/comment-page-1/#comment-2190</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John ffitch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2006 21:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nerdvittles.com/?p=88#comment-2190</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I too am getting the message
Dropping incompatible voice frame on SIP/gw02.uk.sipgate.net-081938b0 of format slin since our native format has changed to alaw
I am not sure what this means.As I understand it sipgate.net use equipment that transmits FAXdata.  What is one supposed to do about this?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too am getting the message<br />
Dropping incompatible voice frame on SIP/gw02.uk.sipgate.net-081938b0 of format slin since our native format has changed to alaw<br />
I am not sure what this means.As I understand it sipgate.net use equipment that transmits FAXdata.  What is one supposed to do about this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: digitized		</title>
		<link>https://nerdvittles.com/handling-incoming-faxes-with-asterisk/comment-page-1/#comment-2029</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[digitized]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 11:49:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nerdvittles.com/?p=88#comment-2029</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@ #35

+1 It would be great to have an updated version of this ..]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ #35</p>
<p>+1 It would be great to have an updated version of this ..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Zeeshan		</title>
		<link>https://nerdvittles.com/handling-incoming-faxes-with-asterisk/comment-page-1/#comment-1712</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zeeshan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jul 2006 09:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nerdvittles.com/?p=88#comment-1712</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[There is no folder cd /usr/src/asterisk/apps in trxibox. Can you update fax article for trix box.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no folder cd /usr/src/asterisk/apps in trxibox. Can you update fax article for trix box.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Vince		</title>
		<link>https://nerdvittles.com/handling-incoming-faxes-with-asterisk/comment-page-1/#comment-1582</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vince]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jun 2006 23:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nerdvittles.com/?p=88#comment-1582</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This works great!  I do have one issue.  How do you set A@H so that it will immediately answer and play fax tones?  Basically, I need to set up a dedicated fax extension, but if someone is at a fax and dials with the handset and wait to hear a tone, A@H will think it is a regular call.  Any thoughts?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This works great!  I do have one issue.  How do you set A@H so that it will immediately answer and play fax tones?  Basically, I need to set up a dedicated fax extension, but if someone is at a fax and dials with the handset and wait to hear a tone, A@H will think it is a regular call.  Any thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Helen		</title>
		<link>https://nerdvittles.com/handling-incoming-faxes-with-asterisk/comment-page-1/#comment-1253</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Helen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 00:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nerdvittles.com/?p=88#comment-1253</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[14th March 2006 AsterFax version 1.0 beta 8 released
After much ado and just plain hard work beta 8 is finally released.
This released was primarily aimed at improving error handling. Previous released of AsterFax where unable to retrieve transmission errors and as such had to assumed that all transmissions failed. With a patch to txfax we can now get acurate error messages and report them when a transmission fails.
A lot of clean up work has also been undertaken as well as support for Rich Text Files and landscape mode.
There is still somework to be done on making the errors human readable.

Beta 8 is another major milestone in AsterFax&#039;s development. All significant features slated for the version 1.0 release have now been implemented. The remaining working centres around improving  the installation process, adding additional converters and adding a header to the fax.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>14th March 2006 AsterFax version 1.0 beta 8 released<br />
After much ado and just plain hard work beta 8 is finally released.<br />
This released was primarily aimed at improving error handling. Previous released of AsterFax where unable to retrieve transmission errors and as such had to assumed that all transmissions failed. With a patch to txfax we can now get acurate error messages and report them when a transmission fails.<br />
A lot of clean up work has also been undertaken as well as support for Rich Text Files and landscape mode.<br />
There is still somework to be done on making the errors human readable.</p>
<p>Beta 8 is another major milestone in AsterFax&#8217;s development. All significant features slated for the version 1.0 release have now been implemented. The remaining working centres around improving  the installation process, adding additional converters and adding a header to the fax.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Marco Mouta		</title>
		<link>https://nerdvittles.com/handling-incoming-faxes-with-asterisk/comment-page-1/#comment-1209</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marco Mouta]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2006 19:29:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nerdvittles.com/?p=88#comment-1209</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been testing FAX to Email with ASterisk@home2.7 and TE110P and after all of your instructions i couldn&#8217;t open PDF file with My Outlook.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been reading in the web and i found this:<br />
<a href="http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+and+faxes" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+and+faxes</a></p>
<p>Update ?¢‚Ç¨‚Äù If the above changes do not fix your mime-construct file, verify the version by going to the unix cli (use keyboard or PuTTY) and type &#8220;mime-construct &#8211;version&#8221;. I found that even if I updated the script above, It made it to where the attachment wouldn&#8217;t come through at all. I checked my version and I had v1.8. I searched and found that there was a slightly newer version 1.9, so I tried it and it seemed to solve my problems.</p>
<p>Procedure:<br />
1. Goto /usr/bin/<br />
2. Rename &#8220;mime-construct&#8221; to &#8220;mime-construct.old&#8221;<br />
3. Copy the 1.9 code from <a href="http://search.cpan.org/src/ROSCH/mime-construct-1.9/mime-construct" rel="nofollow ugc">http://search.cpan.org/src/ROSCH/mime-construct-1.9/mime-construct</a><br />
4. Re-create mime-construct and paste the code. Be sure not to get the comments at the bottom, stop before _END_<br />
5. &#8220;chmod 555 mime-construct&#8221;</p>
<p>And In fact i finally got Fax to Email working just Perfect.<br />
By the Way i&#8217;ve change the name of file attachment for ${TIMESTAMP} to avoid files with empty name (sometimes who sends you faxes doesn&#8217;t provide caller ID)</p>
<p>I hope this helps!</p>
<p>Marco Mouta</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Blade10		</title>
		<link>https://nerdvittles.com/handling-incoming-faxes-with-asterisk/comment-page-1/#comment-1071</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blade10]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 13:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nerdvittles.com/?p=88#comment-1071</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Any ideas why * would recognizeit as a fax call but not create any tiff file?

&lt;i&gt;[WM: Be sure you got rid of the 8.5 x 11 dimensions in the tiff conversion routine.]&lt;/i&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any ideas why * would recognizeit as a fax call but not create any tiff file?</p>
<p><i>[WM: Be sure you got rid of the 8.5 x 11 dimensions in the tiff conversion routine.]</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Helen Cunningham		</title>
		<link>https://nerdvittles.com/handling-incoming-faxes-with-asterisk/comment-page-1/#comment-1060</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Helen Cunningham]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 00:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nerdvittles.com/?p=88#comment-1060</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[1 February 2006 AsterFax verision 1.0 beta 7 released]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1 February 2006 AsterFax verision 1.0 beta 7 released</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Blade10		</title>
		<link>https://nerdvittles.com/handling-incoming-faxes-with-asterisk/comment-page-1/#comment-1039</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blade10]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2006 21:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nerdvittles.com/?p=88#comment-1039</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[OK- It appears worse than I thought. The tiff file is NEVER created. Individually, I removed the command to delete the files after creation, removed tiff2ps, and removed ps2pdf - and tried combination of removals. The tiff is never in the directory. I also tried redefining the saved directory to /home/fax and nada. 

Anyone have any thoughts on this? In the call llog asterisk does recognize the call as a fax call.

I&#039;m stumped.

&lt;i&gt;[WM: If Asterisk doesn&#039;t recognize it as a fax call, then experiment with changing the time parameter in the NVfaxdetect command. We have found that some fax machines work almost every time. Others rarely can connect. No idea why. We tell people to listen for the AutoAttendant and, if they hear it kick in, hang up and try the fax call again. 8 out of 10 times with most fax machines, that solves it at least using a TelaSIP IP trunk.]&lt;/i&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK- It appears worse than I thought. The tiff file is NEVER created. Individually, I removed the command to delete the files after creation, removed tiff2ps, and removed ps2pdf &#8211; and tried combination of removals. The tiff is never in the directory. I also tried redefining the saved directory to /home/fax and nada. </p>
<p>Anyone have any thoughts on this? In the call llog asterisk does recognize the call as a fax call.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m stumped.</p>
<p><i>[WM: If Asterisk doesn&#8217;t recognize it as a fax call, then experiment with changing the time parameter in the NVfaxdetect command. We have found that some fax machines work almost every time. Others rarely can connect. No idea why. We tell people to listen for the AutoAttendant and, if they hear it kick in, hang up and try the fax call again. 8 out of 10 times with most fax machines, that solves it at least using a TelaSIP IP trunk.]</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Blade		</title>
		<link>https://nerdvittles.com/handling-incoming-faxes-with-asterisk/comment-page-1/#comment-1038</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blade]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2006 20:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nerdvittles.com/?p=88#comment-1038</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;IP faxing just isn?¢ÀÜ?°?Ç¬¢?¢‚Ç¨?°?É‚Ä°?Ç¬®?¢‚Ç¨?°?É‚Äò?Ç¬¢t quite soup yet&#8221;</p>
<p>Im using an X100P. Same card in a windows machine will send/rec faxes no problem. Somehow, I think this is some kind of configuration problem, just cant put my finger on it. IM changing the script to not delete the files after emailing, that way I can get a closer look at what is happening. Ill let you know if I find anything interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Blade		</title>
		<link>https://nerdvittles.com/handling-incoming-faxes-with-asterisk/comment-page-1/#comment-1028</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blade]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2006 02:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nerdvittles.com/?p=88#comment-1028</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Forgot to mention I also think the tiff is blank. When monitorinsk asterisk, it appears everything is perfect. However - from the senders end the fax never completes 100% - it appears to but then says &quot;send error&quot;. Line noise is not the problem - I can plug in a real fax machine and it works fine. BTW, awesome site - I would have never got this far without it.

&lt;i&gt;[WM: My non-scientific answer is that some fax machines work great with this, and others have real problems communicating. I&#039;ll keep scratching, but if you need 100% reliability, IP faxing just isn&#039;t quite soup yet.]&lt;/i&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forgot to mention I also think the tiff is blank. When monitorinsk asterisk, it appears everything is perfect. However &#8211; from the senders end the fax never completes 100% &#8211; it appears to but then says &#8220;send error&#8221;. Line noise is not the problem &#8211; I can plug in a real fax machine and it works fine. BTW, awesome site &#8211; I would have never got this far without it.</p>
<p><i>[WM: My non-scientific answer is that some fax machines work great with this, and others have real problems communicating. I&#8217;ll keep scratching, but if you need 100% reliability, IP faxing just isn&#8217;t quite soup yet.]</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Charles		</title>
		<link>https://nerdvittles.com/handling-incoming-faxes-with-asterisk/comment-page-1/#comment-1026</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 19:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nerdvittles.com/?p=88#comment-1026</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[When I say update script..

It was the down and dirty script to update 2.3 to 2.4 that was either part of your Soup to Nust write-up when A@H did the overnight version 2.3-&gt;2.4-&gt;2.5 update. The script updated Asterisk from 1.2.2 to 1.2.3. I later modified it to update Asterisk to 1.2.4.

I will reinstall. Thanks for the information.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I say update script..</p>
<p>It was the down and dirty script to update 2.3 to 2.4 that was either part of your Soup to Nust write-up when A@H did the overnight version 2.3->2.4->2.5 update. The script updated Asterisk from 1.2.2 to 1.2.3. I later modified it to update Asterisk to 1.2.4.</p>
<p>I will reinstall. Thanks for the information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Francesco		</title>
		<link>https://nerdvittles.com/handling-incoming-faxes-with-asterisk/comment-page-1/#comment-1025</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Francesco]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nerdvittles.com/?p=88#comment-1025</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Installed Fax, as Ward told us in his wonderfoul tutorial.
At the end of transmission I have an epty .tif file. 

from sip.conf, I defined alaw &amp; ulaw &amp; gsm codec, so it&#039;s not a codec problem. The problem is also found calling extension 666, so the problem not depends on the VOIP provider.
Any suggestion? Thanks

&lt;i&gt;[WM: If this is AAH 2.5, there apparently are some issues. Check the SourceForge and Voxilla forums for details.]&lt;/i&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Installed Fax, as Ward told us in his wonderfoul tutorial.<br />
At the end of transmission I have an epty .tif file. </p>
<p>from sip.conf, I defined alaw &#038; ulaw &#038; gsm codec, so it&#8217;s not a codec problem. The problem is also found calling extension 666, so the problem not depends on the VOIP provider.<br />
Any suggestion? Thanks</p>
<p><i>[WM: If this is AAH 2.5, there apparently are some issues. Check the SourceForge and Voxilla forums for details.]</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Charles		</title>
		<link>https://nerdvittles.com/handling-incoming-faxes-with-asterisk/comment-page-1/#comment-1024</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nerdvittles.com/?p=88#comment-1024</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Well I am part way there.. I followed this documentation on a AAH 2.3 system (upgraded to 2.5 via an update script) and I was found that my * system was not sending fax tones when faxes were received. I sent Ward an email and he directed me to post on Voxilla and other forums. I did post on forums however no one responded.

So.. I did some digging and came upon information that kinda clicked. In the code &quot;Macro(faxreceive)&quot; it calls rxfax. At the CLI I did a &quot;show applications&quot; and found that rxfax was not listed. 

So.. Down that road I went and ended up downloading the source for spandps. I compiled it and it created the rxfax.c and o files. I followed all directions to rebuild Asterisk. It created the app_rxfax.so file. I rebooted and wham bam.. I now have this app listed in the CLI and my system now sends fax tones and syncs with a fax machine.

My issue now is that I am receiving &quot;poor line condition&quot; issues on the remote fax machines. I do not know where to go from here. I have checked to make sure ztdummy is loaded for timing and I removed the &quot;allow=alaw&quot; command from the sip.conf to force ulaw (I read somewhere to do so).

I am running Telasip as my Voip provider. I will keep trudging and looking around. Any suggestions are greatly appreciated.

&lt;i&gt;[WM: Not sure where you found the update script that was used to move from 2.3 to 2.5, but it really doesn&#039;t matter. I&#039;m pretty sure it probably (permanently) broke reliable faxing. The whole faxing technology was changed in version 2.4 and remains in  2.5 if my memory serves me correctly. Therefore, doing an in place upgrade probably broke something. That&#039;s a very good reason why we always recommend doing screen captures of AMP data and then a fresh ISO install.]&lt;/i&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I am part way there.. I followed this documentation on a AAH 2.3 system (upgraded to 2.5 via an update script) and I was found that my * system was not sending fax tones when faxes were received. I sent Ward an email and he directed me to post on Voxilla and other forums. I did post on forums however no one responded.</p>
<p>So.. I did some digging and came upon information that kinda clicked. In the code &#8220;Macro(faxreceive)&#8221; it calls rxfax. At the CLI I did a &#8220;show applications&#8221; and found that rxfax was not listed. </p>
<p>So.. Down that road I went and ended up downloading the source for spandps. I compiled it and it created the rxfax.c and o files. I followed all directions to rebuild Asterisk. It created the app_rxfax.so file. I rebooted and wham bam.. I now have this app listed in the CLI and my system now sends fax tones and syncs with a fax machine.</p>
<p>My issue now is that I am receiving &#8220;poor line condition&#8221; issues on the remote fax machines. I do not know where to go from here. I have checked to make sure ztdummy is loaded for timing and I removed the &#8220;allow=alaw&#8221; command from the sip.conf to force ulaw (I read somewhere to do so).</p>
<p>I am running Telasip as my Voip provider. I will keep trudging and looking around. Any suggestions are greatly appreciated.</p>
<p><i>[WM: Not sure where you found the update script that was used to move from 2.3 to 2.5, but it really doesn&#8217;t matter. I&#8217;m pretty sure it probably (permanently) broke reliable faxing. The whole faxing technology was changed in version 2.4 and remains in  2.5 if my memory serves me correctly. Therefore, doing an in place upgrade probably broke something. That&#8217;s a very good reason why we always recommend doing screen captures of AMP data and then a fresh ISO install.]</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jeff		</title>
		<link>https://nerdvittles.com/handling-incoming-faxes-with-asterisk/comment-page-1/#comment-1020</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nerdvittles.com/?p=88#comment-1020</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[How about instructions on app_nv_backgrounddetect.so so that you can start playing your IVR while it is detecting.

Thanks!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about instructions on app_nv_backgrounddetect.so so that you can start playing your IVR while it is detecting.</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Steve		</title>
		<link>https://nerdvittles.com/handling-incoming-faxes-with-asterisk/comment-page-1/#comment-951</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 06:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nerdvittles.com/?p=88#comment-951</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[WM: You need a Digium board for SpanDSP to work.]

This is a nice site but there is also some wrong information unfortunatly. SpanDSP does NOT require a digium board to work, this is wrong. I notice that any questions about sending faxes are being ignored, so, Asterfax is is the best solution right now &amp; works with AAH - although you should know that sending and reciving faxes via VoIP is hit and miss, this is what T.37 &amp; T.38 is for (FoIP). VoIP has issues with frames slips which are not noticable with Voice calls but can really screw up faxes.

&lt;i&gt;[WM: You&#039;re absolutely right. There is some wrong information on our site. Never claimed to be anything but human. But when smart folks come along and correct us, we&#039;ll be the first to publish our mistakes for all the world to read. As for SpanDSP, I read an awful lot, and I can&#039;t recall anyone ever mentioning that they got SpanDSP to work reliably without a Digium board but, as you say, VoIP has other issues with faxes. We use NVfaxdetect with TelaSIP IP connections, and it works reliably for us 95% of the time. And we&#039;re batting 100% with junk faxes. That&#039;s good enough for us (Ma Bell wasn&#039;t any better!) but, as they say, YMMV.]&lt;/i&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[WM: You need a Digium board for SpanDSP to work.]</p>
<p>This is a nice site but there is also some wrong information unfortunatly. SpanDSP does NOT require a digium board to work, this is wrong. I notice that any questions about sending faxes are being ignored, so, Asterfax is is the best solution right now &#038; works with AAH &#8211; although you should know that sending and reciving faxes via VoIP is hit and miss, this is what T.37 &#038; T.38 is for (FoIP). VoIP has issues with frames slips which are not noticable with Voice calls but can really screw up faxes.</p>
<p><i>[WM: You&#8217;re absolutely right. There is some wrong information on our site. Never claimed to be anything but human. But when smart folks come along and correct us, we&#8217;ll be the first to publish our mistakes for all the world to read. As for SpanDSP, I read an awful lot, and I can&#8217;t recall anyone ever mentioning that they got SpanDSP to work reliably without a Digium board but, as you say, VoIP has other issues with faxes. We use NVfaxdetect with TelaSIP IP connections, and it works reliably for us 95% of the time. And we&#8217;re batting 100% with junk faxes. That&#8217;s good enough for us (Ma Bell wasn&#8217;t any better!) but, as they say, YMMV.]</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dave		</title>
		<link>https://nerdvittles.com/handling-incoming-faxes-with-asterisk/comment-page-1/#comment-941</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2006 22:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nerdvittles.com/?p=88#comment-941</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ward,

Followed your instructions for getting incoming faxes to be handled by AAH. I&#039;m using an auto attendant for my incoming SIP trunk from Axvoice and have set up the fax handling in the aa_1 context which I created using AMP. To do this, I only had to add the following lines to the aa_1 context in extensions_additional.conf using phpconfig.php page in AMP as the fax extension line ( exten =&gt; fax,1,Goto(ext-fax,in_fax,1) ) is already in the aa_1 context

 exten =&gt; s,4,Playtones(ring) ; play fake ring so caller doesn&#039;t wonder whats going on
exten =&gt; s,5,NVFaxDetect(10) ; while playing ring sound, detect faxes for 2 rings (goes to &quot;fax&quot; extension if detected)

Receiving incoming faxes and the resulting e-mails with pdf file attached is working fine. However, I am having a problem which I think is related to AMP. Whenever, I create a new extension in AMP, or make any other change which requires the extensions_additional.conf file to be written to, the above additions which I have made to aa_1 context in extensions_additional.conf are removed. It appears that the aa_1 context is being overwritten by AMP. Are you aware of any bug in AMP which might be causing this or is this normal? I would expect that any changes which I make to a config file should not be arbitrarily removed.

Thanks,
Dave

&lt;i&gt;[WM: AMP rewrites extensions_additional.conf every time you save any additions using AMP. If you need to protect stuff, put it in extensions_custom.conf which does not get tampered with by AMP.]&lt;/i&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ward,</p>
<p>Followed your instructions for getting incoming faxes to be handled by AAH. I&#8217;m using an auto attendant for my incoming SIP trunk from Axvoice and have set up the fax handling in the aa_1 context which I created using AMP. To do this, I only had to add the following lines to the aa_1 context in extensions_additional.conf using phpconfig.php page in AMP as the fax extension line ( exten => fax,1,Goto(ext-fax,in_fax,1) ) is already in the aa_1 context</p>
<p> exten => s,4,Playtones(ring) ; play fake ring so caller doesn&#8217;t wonder whats going on<br />
exten => s,5,NVFaxDetect(10) ; while playing ring sound, detect faxes for 2 rings (goes to &#8220;fax&#8221; extension if detected)</p>
<p>Receiving incoming faxes and the resulting e-mails with pdf file attached is working fine. However, I am having a problem which I think is related to AMP. Whenever, I create a new extension in AMP, or make any other change which requires the extensions_additional.conf file to be written to, the above additions which I have made to aa_1 context in extensions_additional.conf are removed. It appears that the aa_1 context is being overwritten by AMP. Are you aware of any bug in AMP which might be causing this or is this normal? I would expect that any changes which I make to a config file should not be arbitrarily removed.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Dave</p>
<p><i>[WM: AMP rewrites extensions_additional.conf every time you save any additions using AMP. If you need to protect stuff, put it in extensions_custom.conf which does not get tampered with by AMP.]</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dennis		</title>
		<link>https://nerdvittles.com/handling-incoming-faxes-with-asterisk/comment-page-1/#comment-939</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dennis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2006 20:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nerdvittles.com/?p=88#comment-939</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Help I have tried everything but I never get the fax tones Asterisk 2.5 with the Digum Card 8 FXS 4 FXO with Echo cancellation.   I am willing to pay for help if anyone can help me the asterisk is working but I can not get the fax working.  Thank you.

&lt;i&gt;[WM: Your issue has been reported. Keep an eye on this &lt;a href=&quot;http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?thread_id=1433624&amp;forum_id=420324&quot;&gt;link&lt;/a&gt; for updates. In the meantime, I would try reinstalling from scratch using our tutorial and see what happens.]&lt;/i&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Help I have tried everything but I never get the fax tones Asterisk 2.5 with the Digum Card 8 FXS 4 FXO with Echo cancellation.   I am willing to pay for help if anyone can help me the asterisk is working but I can not get the fax working.  Thank you.</p>
<p><i>[WM: Your issue has been reported. Keep an eye on this <a href="http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?thread_id=1433624&#038;forum_id=420324">link</a> for updates. In the meantime, I would try reinstalling from scratch using our tutorial and see what happens.]</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Michele Garribba		</title>
		<link>https://nerdvittles.com/handling-incoming-faxes-with-asterisk/comment-page-1/#comment-881</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michele Garribba]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2006 16:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nerdvittles.com/?p=88#comment-881</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Ward, no words about your tutorials, simply excellent and usefull.
My question is, what about sending faxes?  I mean the same way, with no fax machine or hardware requirement. I&#039;m thinking about email to fax. I know about two apps that should do something like this, astfax and asterfax. Ever tried them? Alternative you can suggest?
Thanks a lot!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ward, no words about your tutorials, simply excellent and usefull.<br />
My question is, what about sending faxes?  I mean the same way, with no fax machine or hardware requirement. I&#8217;m thinking about email to fax. I know about two apps that should do something like this, astfax and asterfax. Ever tried them? Alternative you can suggest?<br />
Thanks a lot!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Arnold		</title>
		<link>https://nerdvittles.com/handling-incoming-faxes-with-asterisk/comment-page-1/#comment-874</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arnold]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2006 05:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nerdvittles.com/?p=88#comment-874</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I need help! I get a lot of legal size paper faxes. When I open them, they are cut to normal size(8 1/2 by 11). How can I fix this problem? The other thing, would you please teach how to send faxes!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I need help! I get a lot of legal size paper faxes. When I open them, they are cut to normal size(8 1/2 by 11). How can I fix this problem? The other thing, would you please teach how to send faxes!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: David		</title>
		<link>https://nerdvittles.com/handling-incoming-faxes-with-asterisk/comment-page-1/#comment-872</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2006 02:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nerdvittles.com/?p=88#comment-872</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I am curious about this, doesn AAH have SPANDSP which is supposed to already provide Fax support?
I know that when you use Asterisk@home 2.2 under inbound routing there is the ability to enable fax detection for that DID by selecting &quot;AMP Default&quot;, &quot;disbaled&quot;, &quot;system&quot; or you can choose any user extension you need.

So does this mean that the built in support for AAH 2.2 doesnt work?

I am just trying to have an adapter which is connected to a fax machine be able to pick up and receieve faxes.

&lt;i&gt;[WM: You need a Digium board for SpanDSP to work.]&lt;/i&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am curious about this, doesn AAH have SPANDSP which is supposed to already provide Fax support?<br />
I know that when you use Asterisk@home 2.2 under inbound routing there is the ability to enable fax detection for that DID by selecting &#8220;AMP Default&#8221;, &#8220;disbaled&#8221;, &#8220;system&#8221; or you can choose any user extension you need.</p>
<p>So does this mean that the built in support for AAH 2.2 doesnt work?</p>
<p>I am just trying to have an adapter which is connected to a fax machine be able to pick up and receieve faxes.</p>
<p><i>[WM: You need a Digium board for SpanDSP to work.]</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: si		</title>
		<link>https://nerdvittles.com/handling-incoming-faxes-with-asterisk/comment-page-1/#comment-863</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[si]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 00:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nerdvittles.com/?p=88#comment-863</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[i seem to have to same problem as above:

Jan 20 07:49:42 VERBOSE[3575] logger.c: -- Executing RxFAX(&quot;SIP/anonymous.invalid-08ea98e0&quot;, &quot;/var/spool/asterisk/fax/1137714579.5.tif&quot;) in new stack
Jan 20 07:49:42 NOTICE[3575] channel.c: Dropping incompatible voice frame on SIP/anonymous.invalid-08ea98e0 of format slin since our native format has changed to ulaw

any ideas?

&lt;i&gt;[WM: Either your transmission protocol isn&#039;t set to ulaw or your provider&#039;s network isn&#039;t configured to support faxing.]&lt;/i&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i seem to have to same problem as above:</p>
<p>Jan 20 07:49:42 VERBOSE[3575] logger.c: &#8212; Executing RxFAX(&#8220;SIP/anonymous.invalid-08ea98e0&#8221;, &#8220;/var/spool/asterisk/fax/1137714579.5.tif&#8221;) in new stack<br />
Jan 20 07:49:42 NOTICE[3575] channel.c: Dropping incompatible voice frame on SIP/anonymous.invalid-08ea98e0 of format slin since our native format has changed to ulaw</p>
<p>any ideas?</p>
<p><i>[WM: Either your transmission protocol isn&#8217;t set to ulaw or your provider&#8217;s network isn&#8217;t configured to support faxing.]</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
