<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Introducing Incredible PBX 3.0 and Incredible Fax 2.0	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://nerdvittles.com/introducing-incredible-pbx-30-and-incredible-fax-20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://nerdvittles.com/introducing-incredible-pbx-30-and-incredible-fax-20/</link>
	<description>Ward Mundy&#039;s Technobabblelog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2015 15:27:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: avi		</title>
		<link>https://nerdvittles.com/introducing-incredible-pbx-30-and-incredible-fax-20/comment-page-1/#comment-66367</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[avi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2012 16:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nerdvittles.com/?p=795#comment-66367</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Ward;

As always, stupendous job putting this all together, and for the never-ending work of improving n already excellent FREE product.

One recommendation I do have is to work on simplifying the naming convention, as all the like-sounding names and differing version numbers that seem to be at odds with themselves are becoming hard to keep track of: Incredible PBX 3 featuring PiAF2 with incredible fax 2, etc. I realize some numbering is out of your control (e.g. Asterisk 1.8 or 10), but would highly recommend unifying version numbers that PiAF controls.

Thanks again for all your great work]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ward;</p>
<p>As always, stupendous job putting this all together, and for the never-ending work of improving n already excellent FREE product.</p>
<p>One recommendation I do have is to work on simplifying the naming convention, as all the like-sounding names and differing version numbers that seem to be at odds with themselves are becoming hard to keep track of: Incredible PBX 3 featuring PiAF2 with incredible fax 2, etc. I realize some numbering is out of your control (e.g. Asterisk 1.8 or 10), but would highly recommend unifying version numbers that PiAF controls.</p>
<p>Thanks again for all your great work</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
