Comments on: VoIP 101: Developing a Cost-Effective SIP Strategy https://nerdvittles.com/voip-101-developing-a-cost-effective-sip-strategy/ Ward Mundy's Technobabblelog Wed, 08 Jul 2020 17:02:56 +0000 hourly 1 By: Shay https://nerdvittles.com/voip-101-developing-a-cost-effective-sip-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-176221 Tue, 26 Jun 2018 22:12:54 +0000 http://nerdvittles.com/?p=26128#comment-176221 I’ve been using Localphone for a few years, with a $1/mo. number (no taxes/gov fees added either), free incoming, $0.005/min. outgoing in USA. Combine with Google Voice to get free outgoing calls.

]]> By: Drew Tibbetts https://nerdvittles.com/voip-101-developing-a-cost-effective-sip-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-176132 Tue, 12 Jun 2018 01:39:09 +0000 http://nerdvittles.com/?p=26128#comment-176132 Does anyone know what providers do not require port forwarding setups when NAT’ed behind a router?

[WM: As a general rule, if your trunk is registered with the provider using a Registration String, you should not need any port forwarding rule on your NAT-based router. However, some routers don’t handle RTP traffic as they should. You will know when you can’t hear the other party or vice versa.]

]]> By: M https://nerdvittles.com/voip-101-developing-a-cost-effective-sip-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-176123 Mon, 11 Jun 2018 15:35:08 +0000 http://nerdvittles.com/?p=26128#comment-176123 We’re on a mix of voip.ms and vitelity, but Twilio’s SIP Trunking has no max channel limit and extremely compelling pricing. It wasn’t hard at all to set up a trial account and connect with IncrediblePBX 13. The only reason we didn’t migrate our incoming trunks was fear of change/instability from decision makers.

]]>