<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: WebRTC: Asterisk Joins the Brave New World of Real Time Communications	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://nerdvittles.com/webrtc-asterisk-joins-the-brave-new-world-of-real-time-communications/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://nerdvittles.com/webrtc-asterisk-joins-the-brave-new-world-of-real-time-communications/</link>
	<description>Ward Mundy&#039;s Technobabblelog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 17:27:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: John		</title>
		<link>https://nerdvittles.com/webrtc-asterisk-joins-the-brave-new-world-of-real-time-communications/comment-page-1/#comment-92006</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 17:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nerdvittles.com/?p=5321#comment-92006</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I notice you are connecting unsecurely over the ws://, have you been able to get wss:// working directly with asterisk?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I notice you are connecting unsecurely over the ws://, have you been able to get wss:// working directly with asterisk?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: sri1ram		</title>
		<link>https://nerdvittles.com/webrtc-asterisk-joins-the-brave-new-world-of-real-time-communications/comment-page-1/#comment-91762</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sri1ram]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 22:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nerdvittles.com/?p=5321#comment-91762</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[WM, that was a comment on Gopalsamyponnyraj&#039;s question, not your article.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WM, that was a comment on Gopalsamyponnyraj&#8217;s question, not your article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: sri1ram		</title>
		<link>https://nerdvittles.com/webrtc-asterisk-joins-the-brave-new-world-of-real-time-communications/comment-page-1/#comment-90993</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sri1ram]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 18:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nerdvittles.com/?p=5321#comment-90993</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Haven&#039;t you missed the entire point. Asterisk supports WebRTC so that you can directly do RTC (SIP, Calls, Video) from a web-browser without a standalone softphone app.  But to answer your question, you can still have your own softphone (no browser) that talks webRTC with Asterisk. Asterisk puts an additional layer, you put one too, instead of directly using SIP and other APIs as any normal developer would.

&lt;i&gt;[WM: Never claimed to be normal. As far as extra layers are concerned, WebRTC still has to have a host somewhere. You obviously prefer &quot;SIP and other APIs.&quot; We obviously don&#039;t. If you had actually read the article, you&#039;d know that a standalone softphone app was not required, only a Chrome browser. We&#039;re fully aware that a standalone softphone app can also be used. So what? :roll: ]&lt;/i&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haven&#8217;t you missed the entire point. Asterisk supports WebRTC so that you can directly do RTC (SIP, Calls, Video) from a web-browser without a standalone softphone app.  But to answer your question, you can still have your own softphone (no browser) that talks webRTC with Asterisk. Asterisk puts an additional layer, you put one too, instead of directly using SIP and other APIs as any normal developer would.</p>
<p><i>[WM: Never claimed to be normal. As far as extra layers are concerned, WebRTC still has to have a host somewhere. You obviously prefer "SIP and other APIs." We obviously don&#8217;t. If you had actually read the article, you&#8217;d know that a standalone softphone app was not required, only a Chrome browser. We&#8217;re fully aware that a standalone softphone app can also be used. So what? 🙄 ]</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Gopalsamyponnuraj		</title>
		<link>https://nerdvittles.com/webrtc-asterisk-joins-the-brave-new-world-of-real-time-communications/comment-page-1/#comment-90181</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gopalsamyponnuraj]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 12:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nerdvittles.com/?p=5321#comment-90181</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi, I have a doubt, Can we integrate WebRTC with Asterisk without using any browser? Please clarify it. 

Advanced a lot of Thanks.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I have a doubt, Can we integrate WebRTC with Asterisk without using any browser? Please clarify it. </p>
<p>Advanced a lot of Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
